If you wouldn't be able to adopt a baby you shouldn't make a baby
Read more on PeanutThe views expressed in community are solely the opinions of participants, and do not reflect those of Peanut.
Learn more about our guidelines.
Laws for adoption vary place to place. So if I wouldn’t be able to adopt where I live should I just move somewhere where I do meet the requirements and conceive there?
Or is there a specific place’s laws that you think should be the standard everywhere and for everyone? If so whose laws would that be?

You mean a “Classist take”, not a hot take lol.

I wouldn’t engage in the private adoption industry or the paid surrogacy industry purely from a moral standpoint. I would consider fostering and then adopting out of foster care if there’s no chance of reunification. Being willing to pay for the baby of some underprivileged woman is hardly a mark of nobility and worthiness of becoming a parent. Not trying to shit on all adopters because I know all situations are different but yeah this is a bad take

I wouldn't exist if that were the case. I do understand what you are saying though. Adults should do better for their children.

Me and my husband were foster parents and tried to adopt through foster care before we had a biological child. We were able to pass background and medical checks but can't afford a private adoption. Its a long expensive process